Bornhop v. Bornhop
Bornhop v. Bornhop
976 S.W.2d 622; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1681; 1998 WL 643088
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Bornhop v. Bornhop
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Steven R. Bornhop (Father) appeals from the order of the trial court granting Michelle M. Bornhop’s (Mother) motion for new trial or in the alternative motion for relief from judgment and order.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion and find no error of law. VonSande v. Von-Sande, 858 S.W.2d 283, 236 (Mo.App. S.D. 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.