State v. Spencer
State v. Spencer
Opinion of the Court
Joseph Spencer (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury on two counts of assault in the first degree, Section 565.050 RSMo 1994,
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 80.25(b).
The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. All statutory references are to RSMo 1994.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Joseph SPENCER
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published