Williams v. State
Williams v. State
977 S.W.2d 934; 1998 WL 720711
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Williams v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Steve Williams (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.