Sumling v. State
Sumling v. State
982 S.W.2d 718; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 2105; 1998 WL 810141
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Sumling v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant appeals from a judgment, after an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.
The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.