Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998

Brumbaugh v. Montgomery

Brumbaugh v. Montgomery
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 24, 1998 · Ahrens, Crandall, Pudlowski
982 S.W.2d 722; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 2083; 1998 WL 810173 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Brumbaugh v. Montgomery

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Dale J. Montgomery appeals from a judgment awarding Jackie Brum-baugh $26,000 actual damages and $26,000 punitive damages for sexual assault. Montgomery, appealing the judgment pro se, argues that the trial court erred in (1) awarding the plaintiff a judgment when there was no medical evidence of damages, (2) refusing to appoint an attorney for Montgomery, and (3) allowing the trial to proceed without a jury.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.