Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998

Hair v. Voskuil

Hair v. Voskuil
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 27, 1998 · Ahrens, Crandall, Pudlowski
983 S.W.2d 163; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1914; 1998 WL 743740 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Hair v. Voskuil

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff originally filed suit in the small claims court seeking the return of property consisting of foreign currency and a birth certificate that was being held by Defendant. The small claims court entered judgment for Defendant. Plaintiff appealed to the circuit court which reversed the judgment in the small claims court and found that the property should be returned to Plaintiff. Defendant now appeals the judgment of the circuit court.

We have read the briefs and reviewed the legal file and transcript. We find no error of law and no jurisprudential purpose will be served by an extended written opinion. Judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Plaintiffs motion for compensation is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.