Peek v. Peek
Peek v. Peek
983 S.W.2d 564; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1940; 1998 WL 743742
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Peek v. Peek
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Husband, Michael Andrew Peek, appeals from a judgment of dissolution. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Further, the hus
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.