Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998

Bicknese v. Sagehorn

Bicknese v. Sagehorn
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 27, 1998 · Gaertner, Hoff, Russell
983 S.W.2d 565; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1916; 1998 WL 743777 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Bicknese v. Sagehorn

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lessee appeals from a judgment entered against him in an action on account. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.