Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998

Kenmark Motorsport Ltd. v. Burns

Kenmark Motorsport Ltd. v. Burns
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 24, 1998 · Crane, Mooney, Simon
985 S.W.2d 814; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 2107; 1998 WL 810132 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Kenmark Motorsport Ltd. v. Burns

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to set aside a default judgment. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.