Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998

Hardwict v. State

Hardwict v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 24, 1998 · Gaertner, Hoff, Russell
987 S.W.2d 339; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 2089; 1998 WL 809979 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Hardwict v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the judgment, denying without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.