Mayes v. State
Mayes v. State
986 S.W.2d 524; 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 195
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Mayes v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Joseph Mayes files this appeal challenging the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.