Missouri Court of Appeals, 1999

Page v. Clark Refining & Marketing, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 18, 1999 · No. 75104 · Crahan, Hoff, Teitelman

996 S.W.2d 678; 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 690 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Page v. Clark Refining & Marketing, Inc. (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dorothy Page appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s order dismissing her application for review for failing to comply with 8 CSR 20-3.030(3)(A) in that she did not sufficiently state reasons why the Administrative Law Judge’s findings and conclusions were in *679error. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.