Missouri Court of Appeals, 1999

Page v. Clark Refining & Marketing, Inc.

Page v. Clark Refining & Marketing, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 18, 1999 · Crahan, Hoff, Teitelman
996 S.W.2d 678; 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 690 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Page v. Clark Refining & Marketing, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dorothy Page appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s order dismissing her application for review for failing to comply with 8 CSR 20-3.030(3)(A) in that she did not sufficiently state reasons why the Administrative Law Judge’s findings and conclusions were in *679error. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.