Missouri Court of Appeals, 1999

Walker v. State

Walker v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided July 27, 1999 · Crane, Dowd, Pudlowski
998 S.W.2d 820; 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 1004; 1999 WL 540281 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Walker v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eddie Walker (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing after he pleaded guilty to sale of a controlled substance (cocaine) in violation of Section 195.211, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the *821record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.