Missouri Court of Appeals, 1999

Sandlin v. Chrysler Corp.

Sandlin v. Chrysler Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 21, 1999 · Crandall, Hoff, Karohl
2 S.W.3d 848; 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 1867; 1999 WL 731724 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Sandlin v. Chrysler Corp.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Kathy Sandlin, appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s order dismissing her application for review for failing to comply with 8 CSR 20-3.030(3)(A) in that she did not sufficiently state reasons why the Administrative Law Judge’s findings and conclusions were error.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that no error of law appears. A memorandum solely for the use of the parties has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision. As an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.