Boyle v. State
Boyle v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Appellant, Arthur Boyle, (“movant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant seeks to vacate his convictions and sentences for robbery in the first degree, RSMo section 569.020,
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts, and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
. All statutory references are to RSMo 1994, unless otherwise indicated.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.