Johnson v. State
Johnson v. State
9 S.W.3d 645; 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2071; 1999 WL 846113
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Johnson v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant appeals the judgment denying his rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.