Missouri Court of Appeals, 1999

In the Interest of J.R.R.

In the Interest of J.R.R.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided December 21, 1999 · Ahrens, Mooney, Teitelman
24 S.W.3d 707; 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2446; 1999 WL 1243739 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

In the Interest of J.R.R.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals from three judgments terminating his parental rights to his three minor children. The cases were consolidated for purposes of appeal on this Court’s motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and transcript. We find that the judgments are supported by substantial clear, cogent and convincing evidence, and do not erroneously declare or misapply the law. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, furnished the parties with a brief memorandum for their information only stating the reasons for *708this order. We affirm the judgments pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.