Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000

Pritchett v. State

Pritchett v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 18, 2000 · Ahrens, Mooney, Teitelman
9 S.W.3d 723; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 85; 2000 WL 29915 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Pritchett v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Horashio Pritchett appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.