Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000

Courtney v. State

Courtney v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 25, 2000 · Crahan, Gaertner, Russell
10 S.W.3d 594; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 111; 2000 WL 52783 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Courtney v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Courtney (Movant) appeals the trial court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.