Bostic v. State
Bostic v. State
10 S.W.3d 607; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 194; 2000 WL 136086
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Bostic v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Bobby Bostic (movant) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the determination of the trial court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.