Barr v. State
Barr v. State
14 S.W.3d 148; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 88; 2000 WL 29919
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Barr v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Timothy Barr (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential or jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.