Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000

Burage v. State

Burage v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 9, 2000 · Dowd, Gaertner, Simon
16 S.W.3d 758; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 663; 2000 WL 558494 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Burage v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying a Rule 29.15 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.