Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000

Dye v. Dye

Dye v. Dye
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 30, 2000 · Ahrens, Mooney, Teitelman
18 S.W.3d 555; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 805; 2000 WL 685580 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Dye v. Dye

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brenda Louise Dye appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to modify the parties’ decree of dissolution. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare *556or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(1).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.