Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000

City of Breckenridge Hills v. Walk

City of Breckenridge Hills v. Walk
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 30, 2000 · Dowd, Gaertner, Simon
19 S.W.3d 700; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 813; 2000 WL 709487 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

City of Breckenridge Hills v. Walk

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, City of Breckenridge Hills, appeals the trial court’s decision sustaining Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the princi-pies of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.