Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000

Stuckenschneider v. Taylor

Stuckenschneider v. Taylor
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided July 25, 2000 · Ahrens, Crandall, Dowd
22 S.W.3d 760; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1147; 2000 WL 1013967 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Stuckenschneider v. Taylor

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Susan Stuckenschneider (Plaintiff) appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of Reginald Taylor (Defendant) in a personal injury lawsuit. Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in permitting defense counsel to argue the comparative fault of her husband. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the parties’ briefs and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.