Vancil v. State
Vancil v. State
22 S.W.3d 787; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1145; 2000 WL 1048049
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Vancil v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant, Donald Vancil, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.