Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000

Vancil v. State

Vancil v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided July 25, 2000 · Ahrens, Crandall, Dowd
22 S.W.3d 787; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1145; 2000 WL 1048049 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Vancil v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Donald Vancil, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.