Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000

Whittaker v. State

Whittaker v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 1, 2000 · Mooney, Simon, Sullivan
23 S.W.3d 260; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1184; 2000 WL 1051835 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Whittaker v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Romell Whittaker (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the circuit court denying his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of *261the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.