L.J. ex rel. D.V-C. v. W.W.J.
L.J. ex rel. D.V-C. v. W.W.J.
24 S.W.3d 165; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 586; 2000 WL 462383
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
L.J. ex rel. D.V-C. v. W.W.J.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Plaintiffs, L.J., by and through her next Mend and parent D.V.C., and D.V.C. individually, appeal from the trial court’s judgment quashing their equitable garnishment against Defendant, Vigilant Insurance Company. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only,
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(5) and deny Defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.