ORDER

This is an appeal from a judgment denying a Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and re*215stating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).