Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000

Taylor v. State

Taylor v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 1, 2000 · Dowd, Gaertner, Simon
24 S.W.3d 737; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 155; 2000 WL 108615 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Taylor v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Taylor (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.