Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000

Sarkis v. Heimburger

Sarkis v. Heimburger
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 1, 2000 · Ahrens, Mooney, Teitelman
24 S.W.3d 738; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 154; 2000 WL 108679 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Sarkis v. Heimburger

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Sarkis, et al, (“Plaintiffs”) appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of their petition against Roy Heimburger, et al., (“Defendants”) for lack of standing.

We find that no error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.