Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000

Hodges v. State

Hodges v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 31, 2000 · Ahrens, Crandall, Dowd
30 S.W.3d 250; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1606; 2000 WL 1617992 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Hodges v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Hodges (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on *251appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑