Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000

Matt v. State

Matt v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 19, 2000 · Mooney, Simon, Sullivan
30 S.W.3d 837; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1377; 2000 WL 1341514 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Matt v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Matt, Jr. (“Movant”) appeals from a judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15.1 Movant claims ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. Ail rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P. 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.