Ray v. State
Ray v. State
30 S.W.3d 921; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1649; 2000 WL 1702680
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Ray v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Tina Ray (hereinafter, “Movant”) appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing in that her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to inform her that upon completion of a long term drug treatment program Movant would be eligible for probation and not parole.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts and find the motion’s court decision was not clearly erroneous. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.