Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000

O'Donnell v. Bi-State Roof Systems, Inc.

O'Donnell v. Bi-State Roof Systems, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 17, 2000 · Mooney, Simon, Sullivan
32 S.W.3d 136; 2000 WL 1528928 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

O'Donnell v. Bi-State Roof Systems, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

*137ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James O’Donnell (Appellant) appeals the trial court’s grant of Bi State Roof Systems, Inc.’s (Respondent) Motion for Summary Judgment based on a release with Hycel Properties Company (Hycel) signed by Appellant, and its denial of Appellant’s Motion for Reconsideration.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.