State v. Bain
State v. Bain
32 S.W.3d 137; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1569; 2000 WL 1576973
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
State v. Bain
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Keith Bain (Defendant) appeals from his convictions for second degree burglary, section 569.170, RSMo 1994, possession of a controlled substance, section 195.202, RSMo 1994, and possession of drug paraphernalia, section 195.233, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the parties’ exclusive use setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.