Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000

Sickinger v. State

Sickinger v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 31, 2000 · Blackmar, Crane, Hoff
33 S.W.3d 194; 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1600; 2000 WL 1617734 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Sickinger v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Michael Sickinger, appeals from the trial court’s judgment sustaining his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief which judgment was twice modified in accord with movant’s requests in order to facilitate the process by which federal authorities would take movant into custody so that he could serve his state sentences in federal custody concurrently with a federal sentence as agreed in a plea bargain. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.