Jewels v. State
Jewels v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Glen Jewels (“Appellant”) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R. Civ. P.2000, unless otherwise indicated.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.