Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001

Peterson v. C. Rallo Contracting Co.

Peterson v. C. Rallo Contracting Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 6, 2001 · Crane, Crist, Hoff
36 S.W.3d 800; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 197; 2001 WL 96201 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Peterson v. C. Rallo Contracting Co.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge.. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.