Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001

Rasche v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 3, 2001 · Dowd, Russell, Teitelman

41 S.W.3d 48; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 559; 2001 WL 314817 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Rasche v. State (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*49ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, David Rasche, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On direct appeal, we affirmed Movant’s convictions and sentences for attempted forcible sodomy under Sections 566.060 and 564.011 and trespass in the first degree under Section 560.140. State v. Rasche, 985 S.W.2d 868 (Mo.App. E.D. 1998).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

. Unless otherwise indicated, all Rule references are to the Missouri Court Rules (2000) and all statutory references are to RSMo 1994.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.