Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001

Trust v. State

Trust v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 17, 2001 · Ahrens, Crandall, Dowd
43 S.W.3d 460; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 662; 2001 WL 399463 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Trust v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Steven Trust, pled guilty to violating section 195.211, RSMo 2000, sale of a controlled substance, and section 195.202, RSMo 2000, misdemeanor possession of a controlled substance. He now appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.