Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001

Tatum v. State

Tatum v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 17, 2001
43 S.W.3d 880; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 654; 2001 WL 379098 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Tatum v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Judy Tatum (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 24 .035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.