Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001

Daniel v. State

Daniel v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 15, 2001 · Mooney, Simon, Sullivan
43 S.W.3d 906; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 810; 2001 WL 505698 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Daniel v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bernard Daniel (Movant) appeals from a judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.151 following an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rale references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2001, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.