Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001

Watson v. Knoll

Watson v. Knoll
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 24, 2001 · Ahrens, Crandall, Dowd
44 S.W.3d 431; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 681; 2001 WL 410253 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Watson v. Knoll

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pamela Watson (“plaintiff’) appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding her $7,000.00 for injuries she sustained as a result of an automobile accident where Catherine Knoll (“defendant”) struck plaintiffs automobile from behind. Plaintiff claims the trial court erred in allowing Dr. Simon Horenstein (“doctor”) to change his previously given deposition opinion regarding plaintiffs condition prior to the accident.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.