Conkin v. State
Conkin v. State
45 S.W.3d 481; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 530; 2001 WL 289775
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Conkin v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Shane Conkin appeals the trial court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evi-dentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum setting out the basis of the court’s decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment Affirmed. Rule 84..16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.