Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001

Rockhold v. Rockhold

Rockhold v. Rockhold
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 29, 2001 · Ahrens, Crane, Hoff
45 S.W.3d 927; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 876; 2001 WL 568942 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Rockhold v. Rockhold

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Clayton Eugene Rockhold (Husband) appeals from the trial court’s Judgment and Decree of Dissolution of Marriage (judgment) to the extent it awarded Lenna L. Rockhold a greater portion of the marital property and directed Husband to pay the parties’ marital debts.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.