Martin v. Floerchinger
Martin v. Floerchinger
46 S.W.3d 688; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1039; 2001 WL 682707
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Martin v. Floerchinger
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This is an appeal from a judgment in defendant’s favor on his claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and quantum meruit. Plaintiff contends that the weight of the evidence supports his unjust enrichment claim. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. 1976). No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84 .16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.