Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001

Worthy v. State

Worthy v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 9, 2001 · Mooney, Simon, Sullivan
50 S.W.3d 799; 2001 WL 488951 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Worthy v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Montrell Worthy, appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.