Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001

State v. Winslow

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 28, 2001 · Ahrens, Gaertner, Teitelman

53 S.W.3d 251; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1445; 2001 WL 969063 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Winslow v. State (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Robert Winslow, appeals from the judgment convicting him of two counts of first-degree robbery and two counts of armed criminal action. He contends the trial court plainly erred because it failed to sua sponte prohibit the State from trying all four charged offenses in the same trial. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the court did not commit error, plain or otherwise. Rule 30.20. An extended opinion would have serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. *252We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.