Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001

State v. Barber

State v. Barber
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 28, 2001 · Crahan, Mooney, Sullivan
53 S.W.3d 254; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1419; 2001 WL 969096 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Barber

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kermit Barber, Appellant, appeals from the judgment denying his “Motion to Correct Manifest Injustice Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29.07(d).” We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.